Authority and scope
Check the license and concern
OPLC administers three relevant boards. Psychologists have their own board. Mental Health Practice covers clinical mental-health counselors, independent clinical and other regulated social workers, marriage-and-family therapists, and pastoral psychotherapists. Alcohol and Other Drug Use Professionals covers LADC, MLADC, licensed clinical-supervisor, and certified recovery-support-worker credentials. The shared OPLC rules apply to these boards; name the exact credential in your report.
Supporting guidance: RSA 310:2 boards administered by OPLC ↗RSA 330-A:2 definitions ↗RSA 330-C:2 definitions ↗
Match the route to the credential
Use the license listed in the practitioner's records or official license lookup. A psychiatrist is a physician; psychiatric nurses have nursing credentials. Some psychologists have prescribing authority, so medication alone does not identify the licensing board.
Choose the right licensing authority
Psychologists
Board of Psychologists: shared OPLC written complaint rules; psychology privilege protections.
Open this official route ↗Mental-health counselors, social workers, and MFTs
Board of Mental Health Practice: shared OPLC intake, with mental-health privilege protections.
Open this official route ↗Alcohol/drug counselors and related state credentials
Separate substance-use professional board using OPLC intake; federal records-confidentiality provisions also apply.
Open this official route ↗How the official source says to file
- Plc 204 requires a written complaint and identifies Complaints@oplc.nh.gov for electronic submission. Plc 202.10(b) requires emailed documents as PDF attachments. Include the practitioner and credential, known license number, facts with dates and places, witnesses, your contact information, and relevant attempts to resolve the matter or reports elsewhere.
- Electronic submission constitutes signature and date. Otherwise, the complainant or authorized representative signs. The signature certifies a grounded, truthful report made for a proper purpose. Keep supporting material and a copy of what you send.
- Identify whether you are the patient, the patient’s authorized representative, or another person. Ask OPLC how the applicable therapy-record protections and any required authorization apply before sending records about someone else.
Supporting guidance: OPLC Plc 100–200 rules ↗RSA 310:9 investigations ↗
What this route may not provide
These professional complaint routes do not establish the regulator for every clinic, program, or privately certified coach. Psychiatrist and psychiatric advanced-practice-nurse concerns use the medical and nursing guides. Boards can impose reprimands, probation, suspension, revocation, and administrative fines. The sanctions provision also allows confidential non-disciplinary concern letters; it does not establish a consumer compensation award.
Supporting guidance: RSA 310:12 sanctions ↗
Do not guess about confidentiality
The rules call for complainant identification and do not establish an anonymous-filing option. Investigation information generally remains confidential until public disciplinary proceedings, with statutory exceptions. A subject ordinarily receives the complaint if investigation proceeds, unless disclosure would risk safety or compromise criminal investigation. Confidentiality does not guarantee the practitioner will not learn the allegations.
Supporting guidance: OPLC Plc 100–200 rules ↗RSA 310:9 investigations ↗
Report promptly; the five-year rule runs from OPLC’s reasonable discovery.
Plc 204 calls for reporting reasonably promptly after the conduct or discovery. RSA 310:9 generally requires allegations to be brought within five years after OPLC reasonably could have discovered the conduct, with exceptions for criminal convictions, relevant discipline elsewhere, and patterns or cumulative conduct. This is not simply five years from the patient’s incident; ask OPLC how it applies.
Supporting guidance: OPLC Plc 100–200 rules ↗RSA 310:9 investigations ↗
What may happen after filing
OPLC screens and investigates alleged misconduct for the relevant board. Supported matters can proceed to discipline, while a board may close a matter or use a confidential concern letter when evidence does not support discipline. Public sanctions are distinct from confidential preliminary investigation.
Supporting guidance: OPLC Plc 100–200 rules ↗RSA 310:9 investigations ↗RSA 310:12 sanctions ↗
Prepare a reviewable submission
State the concern you want reviewed, give a short chronology and factual consequences, and explain your request. Keep supporting records and follow the receiving authority’s instructions before attaching or sending them.
Read the linked authority and process information ↗
Sources and scope
RSA 310:2 boards administered by OPLC ↗
Express applicability to all three relevant boards.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
OPLC Plc 100–200 rules ↗
Plc 202.10 PDF attachments and Plc 204 complaint scope, email, signature, contents, promptness, subject disclosure, and confidentiality.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
RSA 310:9 investigations ↗
Office-discovery timing and exceptions; mental-health record access, patient permission, and privacy safeguards.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
RSA 330-A:2 definitions ↗
Counselor, social-work, MFT, and pastoral-psychotherapist scope.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
RSA 330-C:2 definitions ↗
LADC, MLADC, clinical-supervisor, and recovery-support credentials.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
RSA 330-C:26 privileged communications ↗
Separate federal substance-use-record confidentiality requirement.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
RSA 329-B:26 privileged communications ↗
Psychology privilege and statutory exceptions.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
RSA 330-A:32 privileged communications ↗
Mental-health privilege, court-order/federal-law exceptions.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
RSA 310:12 sanctions ↗
Disciplinary sanctions and confidential concern letters.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
Source check: September 19, 2026. This records a review of the linked material, not a decision about your case. No clinical or legal reviewer is identified for this guide. Confirm current instructions with the receiving authority.