Authority and scope
Check the license and concern
The Board regulates dentists and dental hygienists; OPLC issues expanded function dental auxiliary permits. OPLC's complaint rules apply to Dental Examiners under RSA 310:2. Identify any assistant's role and supervising dentist, including concerns about unauthorized procedures.
Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: OPLC boards under RSA 310:2 ↗New Hampshire: dental practice act ↗New Hampshire: dental rules ↗New Hampshire: OPLC procedural rules ↗
Choose the right licensing authority
OPLC written-complaint requirements
Plc 204 supplies written complaint and email requirements for professions within OPLC, including dentistry.
Open this official route ↗How the official source says to file
- Plc 204.02 directs written complaints to Complaints@oplc.nh.gov; email filing requires a PDF attachment under Plc 202.10(b). Include profession, subject's name and known license number, conduct, dates, locations, witnesses and your contact details.
- State whether you tried resolution, retained counsel or reported elsewhere. Sign and date; electronic filing itself constitutes the signature and transmission date under the rule.
- Signing certifies authorization, factual grounds and a proper purpose. Ask OPLC whether any additional dental-record authorization is needed; a current complaint form was not available to check.
Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: OPLC procedural rules ↗
What this route may not provide
Dental misconduct includes incompetence, gross or repeated negligence, dishonest conduct and specified sedation-consent failures. The sanctions law provides license restrictions, reprimands and fines; a refund or damages remedy was not established. Identify clinical facts rather than treating a disputed price or office ownership as proof.
Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: dental practice act ↗New Hampshire: RSA 310:12 ↗
Do not guess about confidentiality
The rules require complainant identity. The subject normally receives a copy unless disclosure jeopardizes safety or a criminal investigation. Investigation materials are confidential unless incorporated into a public disciplinary hearing, with authorized agency and legal disclosures.
Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: OPLC procedural rules ↗New Hampshire: RSA 310:9 ↗
Five-year rule tied to OPLC discovery, with exceptions
RSA 310:9 generally requires allegations within five years after OPLC reasonably could have discovered the conduct. Exceptions address criminal convictions, discipline in another jurisdiction, and qualifying patterns or cumulative conduct. File promptly; ask OPLC how this applies to your facts rather than calculating from treatment date alone.
Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: RSA 310:9 ↗New Hampshire: OPLC procedural rules ↗
What may happen after filing
OPLC screens viability and may investigate or recommend dismissal. Investigation can include records and experts; unsupported cases receive written dismissal reasons. Cases may proceed to settlement or hearing.
Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: RSA 310:9 ↗New Hampshire: RSA 310:10 ↗
Prepare a reviewable submission
State the concern you want reviewed, give a short chronology and factual consequences, and explain your request. Keep supporting records and follow the receiving authority’s instructions before attaching or sending them.
Read the linked authority and process information ↗
Sources and scope
New Hampshire: OPLC boards under RSA 310:2 ↗
Express inclusion of Board of Dental Examiners within OPLC.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
New Hampshire: dental practice act ↗
Dentists, hygienists, expanded function auxiliary permits and professional misconduct.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
New Hampshire: dental rules ↗
Dentist/hygienist definitions and May 2024 procedural replacement.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
New Hampshire: OPLC procedural rules ↗
Plc 204 written complaint, email, contents, signatures, subject disclosure and investigation.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
New Hampshire: RSA 310:9 ↗
Five-year office-discovery rule, exceptions, confidentiality and investigation.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
New Hampshire: RSA 310:12 ↗
Available disciplinary and nondisciplinary sanctions.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
New Hampshire: RSA 310:10 ↗
Settlements, hearings and public disciplinary outcomes.
Source checked: September 19, 2026
Source check: September 19, 2026. This records a review of the linked material, not a decision about your case. No clinical or legal reviewer is identified for this guide. Confirm current instructions with the receiving authority.