Care first. Seek urgent medical or dental attention for serious or worsening symptoms. Researching or preparing a complaint should never delay treatment.

New Hampshire · Dental

New Hampshire Board of Dental Examiners / Office of Professional Licensure and Certification

Complaint instructions checked against the linked sources, with limitations and known conflicts. Confirm that the authority covers your concern.

Authority and scope

Check the license and concern

The Board regulates dentists and dental hygienists; OPLC issues expanded function dental auxiliary permits. OPLC's complaint rules apply to Dental Examiners under RSA 310:2. Identify any assistant's role and supervising dentist, including concerns about unauthorized procedures.

Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: OPLC boards under RSA 310:2New Hampshire: dental practice actNew Hampshire: dental rulesNew Hampshire: OPLC procedural rules

Choose the right licensing authority

OPLC written-complaint requirements

Plc 204 supplies written complaint and email requirements for professions within OPLC, including dentistry.

Open this official route ↗
Submission

How the official source says to file

  • Plc 204.02 directs written complaints to Complaints@oplc.nh.gov; email filing requires a PDF attachment under Plc 202.10(b). Include profession, subject's name and known license number, conduct, dates, locations, witnesses and your contact details.
  • State whether you tried resolution, retained counsel or reported elsewhere. Sign and date; electronic filing itself constitutes the signature and transmission date under the rule.
  • Signing certifies authorization, factual grounds and a proper purpose. Ask OPLC whether any additional dental-record authorization is needed; a current complaint form was not available to check.

Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: OPLC procedural rules

Limits

What this route may not provide

Dental misconduct includes incompetence, gross or repeated negligence, dishonest conduct and specified sedation-consent failures. The sanctions law provides license restrictions, reprimands and fines; a refund or damages remedy was not established. Identify clinical facts rather than treating a disputed price or office ownership as proof.

Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: dental practice actNew Hampshire: RSA 310:12

Anonymity

Do not guess about confidentiality

The rules require complainant identity. The subject normally receives a copy unless disclosure jeopardizes safety or a criminal investigation. Investigation materials are confidential unless incorporated into a public disciplinary hearing, with authorized agency and legal disclosures.

Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: OPLC procedural rulesNew Hampshire: RSA 310:9

Complaint timing

Five-year rule tied to OPLC discovery, with exceptions

RSA 310:9 generally requires allegations within five years after OPLC reasonably could have discovered the conduct. Exceptions address criminal convictions, discipline in another jurisdiction, and qualifying patterns or cumulative conduct. File promptly; ask OPLC how this applies to your facts rather than calculating from treatment date alone.

Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: RSA 310:9New Hampshire: OPLC procedural rules

Process

What may happen after filing

OPLC screens viability and may investigate or recommend dismissal. Investigation can include records and experts; unsupported cases receive written dismissal reasons. Cases may proceed to settlement or hearing.

Supporting guidance: New Hampshire: RSA 310:9New Hampshire: RSA 310:10

Evidence

Prepare a reviewable submission

State the concern you want reviewed, give a short chronology and factual consequences, and explain your request. Keep supporting records and follow the receiving authority’s instructions before attaching or sending them.

Read the linked authority and process information ↗

Sources and scope

New Hampshire: RSA 310:9

Five-year office-discovery rule, exceptions, confidentiality and investigation.

Source checked: September 19, 2026

Source check: September 19, 2026. This records a review of the linked material, not a decision about your case. No clinical or legal reviewer is identified for this guide. Confirm current instructions with the receiving authority.

A state authority is one checkpoint—not the entire accountability system.

Compare the available routes →